Start free trial
● Real CAs · Named bylines · Public credentials

The CAs behind
ThynkTax.

Every section page, case-law summary, and circular note on ThynkTax is reviewed by a named Chartered Accountant. Combined practice experience: 77+ years across direct tax, GST, ROC, TDS, payroll, and ESI/PF.

VS

CA Vikram Shah

Head of Tax Research

FCA, LL.B., Diploma in International Taxation (ICAI)

Vikram leads the ThynkTax Tax Research desk. Before joining, he spent 22 years in CA practice - most recently as a Partner at a leading Bengaluru firm specialising in cross-border taxation, transfer pricing, and DTAA matters. He has represented clients before the ITAT in Bengaluru, Chennai, and Mumbai, and contributed to CBDT consultation papers on Section 195 and the equalisation levy.

Expertise
International tax & DTAATransfer pricingITAT representationCross-border restructuringIT Act 2025 transitional matters
22+ years · India
PN

CA Priya Narayanan

Head of GST Practice

FCA, CS, Insolvency Professional

Priya leads ThynkTax's GST research and compliance content. She spent 14 years in indirect-tax practice before joining, with deep experience in GST litigation, IMS reconciliation, e-invoicing rollouts, and the Safari Retreats fact pattern. She is a frequent speaker at the GSTPAM (GST Practitioners Association of Mumbai) and contributes to the ICAI Indirect Tax Committee.

Expertise
GST returns (GSTR-1/3B/9/9C)IMS and 2B reconciliationE-invoicing and IRNGST litigation and Section 17(5)CGST/SGST/IGST classification
14 years · India
RB

CA Rohan Bhattacharya

Head of ROC & Corporate Tax

ACA, CS, M.Com

Rohan runs ThynkTax's ROC, MCA, and corporate tax desk. His prior experience includes 11 years at a Big-4 Indian member firm advising listed companies on AOC-4 XBRL filings, MGT-7, director KYC, BEN-2, and CSR compliance under Section 135. He has been on CBDT's working group for the Faceless Assessment Scheme rollout.

Expertise
ROC filings (AOC-4, MGT-7, BEN-2)XBRL tagging and IND-AS taxonomyCSR compliance (Section 135)MCA V3 portalDirector KYC and SBO reporting
11 years · India
AS

CA Anand Subramanian

Head of TDS, Payroll & ESI/PF

FCA, CMA

Anand leads the TDS, payroll, and ESI/PF practice. He brings 18 years of practice including 7 years as Partner at a 40-person Chennai CA firm. He authored ThynkTax's implementation of the Checkmate Services principle (employee PF must be deposited by labour-law due date) and the new Section 393 unified TDS framework under IT Act 2025.

Expertise
TDS / TCS complianceForm 16 / Form 130 generationPF, ESI, professional taxSection 43B complianceTRACES integration
18 years · India
M.D

Mehul D.

Founder & CEO

B.Tech (IIT), Ex-McKinsey, Builder

Mehul founded ORIS Intelligence with the conviction that India's compliance stack - from GST to ROC to ITR - deserves to be agentic, free at its base layer, and indexable to the world. He led product at two B2B SaaS companies before ORIS. He is responsible for the platform architecture and the bet that tax law should be a public good.

Expertise
Product strategyAgentic systems architectureB2B SaaSIndia SME compliance
12 years · India
TR

ThynkTax Tax Research Team

Section commentaries, case-law summaries, circular index

4 CAs + 2 tax-trained editors

The collective byline for content produced by the desk - IT Act 2025 section pages, case-law summaries, circular indexing, and DTAA treaty commentaries. Each page is reviewed by a named CA before publication; the named CA is recorded in the page's Article schema. Editorial standards: every claim is sourced; every section quotes the official gazette or CBDT notification; every judgment summary follows Facts → Issue → Held → Ratio.

Expertise
IT Act 2025 commentaryCase law summarisationCBDT circular indexingDTAA treaty notes
Collective

Editorial standards

  • Named reviewer for every section page

    Each /income-tax/sections/* page is reviewed by a CA from the team before publication. The reviewer's identity is recorded in the page's Article schema (`author`) and visible in the page metadata.

  • Source-anchored claims

    Every factual claim links to its source - the official gazette, the CBDT notification, the relevant CBDT circular, or the case citation. We do not paraphrase without attribution.

  • Facts → Issue → Held → Ratio for case law

    Every judgment summary follows the same structure. No "spin" - the holding is stated faithfully, even where it has been later reversed or amended (we note the subsequent treatment).

  • Plain-language explanation

    Statutory text is preserved separately; the commentary is in plain English aimed at a CA in practice or an informed taxpayer. We avoid jargon where a plain word will do.

  • Disclaimer on every page

    ThynkTax content is not a substitute for professional advice on specific facts and circumstances. The statutory text and judicial pronouncements control; the commentary is a structured pointer.

  • Public corrections log

    When we get something wrong, we correct it transparently. The correction history is on each page (when applicable) and on /editorial/corrections.

Working at ThynkTax?

We hire CAs, tax lawyers, and engineers who care about getting the citation right.

Pitch us a role