ThynkTax /Tax Reference /Case Laws /Vatika Township - Retrospective amendments

Vatika Township - Retrospective amendments

Supreme Court of India·2014·ITR
Facts

Retrospective application of the surcharge amendment under Section 113 of IT Act 1961.

Issue

Is the amendment substantive or clarificatory?

Held

Where an amendment creates a new burden, it must be presumed prospective unless legislature uses unambiguous retrospective language.

Ratio

Tax statutes affecting substantive rights are presumed prospective; retrospective effect requires explicit legislative intent.

Use via API

Free, public REST. Fetch this judgment programmatically.

API docs
curl https://api.thynktax.com/v1/tax-law/case-laws?q=Vatika%20Township%20-%20Retrospective%20amendments